Mark Fenster has an amusing post on PrawfsBlawg today about teaching administrative law and boredom:
Being bored and being boring is a defining feature of adulthood, of responsibility, of doing the things that need to be done in order to live and provide for others. Mastery of anything requires repetition; repetition by definition is boring. . . . More significantly, like most professions law is about repetitive tasks and arcane things. There are periods of great, sustained, enervating intellectual activity in many legal jobs, but also vast stretches of reading, research, and manipulating boiler plate that are defined by their dreariness. . . . this is why I think it's our obligation to make our material dry and difficult and, where appropriate, boring.
Fenster describes himself as the "Andy Kaufman of legal blogging," but I think his post does expose an important, seldom-discussed truth about practicing law -- some practice areas involve immersing yourself in a lot of boring, tedious, and complicated material day after day. Sure, most people don't want to closely study a 200-page Federal Register notice, but in certain practice areas, it's inevitable that you'll have to analyze these kinds of documents with alarming frequency. If sifting through dry, complex statutes and regulations makes you deeply unhappy, transactional lawyering (e.g., tax, health care, or benefits lawyer) is not for you! If, on the other hand, you find great satisfaction in untangling the intricacies of the Internal Revenue Code and its accompanying regulations, a transactional practice might be a good fit. It never hurts to reflect on your tolerance for tedium before you make a career choice.